« January 2004 | Main | March 2004 »
February 28, 2004
Great CC intro video
We announced winners of the Creative Commons moving images contest and I really like the winning entry. It looks great, sounds great, and explains all the basic details of the Creative Commons licensing process, using reels of public domain footage to convey the message:
Building on the Past
by Justin Cone
Watch Now (7Mb, mov)
This movie is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Posted by 04:36 AM | TrackBack
February 27, 2004
Note to innovators: translate technology to users
When I heard about the XHTML Friends Network, I kind of filed it away with FOAF and other technology projects that sound interesting but entirely too academic, since they often offer no immediate means to incorporate them into my sites/tools. When I noticed that XFN was a blogroll thing and that I recently started using some code to extract my blo.gs favorites into a blogroll here on this site, I asked Jim if it was possible to incorporate xfn into the blo.gs tool.
He launched it today and here's a screenshot of the interface for one of my favorites. It's dead simple, letting you click a few boxes and push a button to fill out your relationship info and eventually the info will percolate into my blogroll here on my site.
A lot of new technologies focus so much on the nitty gritty details of RDF, XML, etc and I think developers forget that people won't or can't use any technology until it's got an easy-to-use interface. I know it's important at some level, but I couldn't care less about say, which RDF vocabulary FOAF will use, I only care how easy it will be to add FOAF stuff to my site (best is having something do it automatically) and what cool apps people can build off it.
Posted by 02:09 AM | TrackBack
February 26, 2004
History hopefully never repeats itself
Ernest Miller takes a look at the history of the anti-miscegenation ammendment. While you read that, don't forget to celebrate Alabama's 3 and 1/2 years of legal interracial marriage.
Posted by 10:36 AM | TrackBack
February 25, 2004
Roll up the constitution and beat them over the head with it and say no! bad gay man!
It's funny, watching tonight's episode of Queer Eye I noticed that they're often readying guys for marriage even though they themselves can't get married and very soon might never be able to. Funny how that works.
Posted by 12:04 PM | TrackBack
February 24, 2004
I got 99 problems but copyright ain't one.
I've been a fan of hip hop off and on since the 80s and the genre seems to work in fits and spurts. In between years of greatness you get years of the same old thing. In 1986 it was one single after another from LL Cool J, Kool Moe Dee, and Big Daddy Kane all boasting who had the biggest dick and got the most girls. Then De La Soul, Public Enemy, and NWA came along and showed us you could rap about other aspects of life and change the sound of music in the process. In the early 90's we had a rash of gangsta rap that never seemed to end, though Tupac and Snoop Dogg were highlights. These days hip hop seems to be all about the bling and it's gotten boring once again. I know Jay Z's just as guilty in that regard for bringing Big Pimpin' to the big time, but I have to say The Grey Album is the first interesting hip hop project I've heard in a while. The Black Album it is based on is ok, and although the pairing with White Album samples sounds like a gimmick at first, the final output transcends it all. I've been listening to it for weeks and I can't put it down. I can tell it's going to be a classic I'll be listening to for years.
Which brings me to the complete illegality of the project. It's most definitely illegal art and although I can't defend DJ Dangermouse for trying to sell 3,000 copies, I don't see a problem with the mere act of having the music, playing the music, or sharing it with friends in a non-commercial context. The very concept of illegal art is absurd. The illegal art site is a great source for previous work by those bluring the lines of art with trademark and copyright and points out the problems of over-reaching intellectual property laws. A turntablist looking to make a buck certainly should do whatever is necessary before making a remix, but if profit isn't the goal, I can't see a problem building new music from previous samples with or without permission. Remix-ready vocal-only versions of The Black Album were released by Jay Z for a reason, and The Grey Album is best product of the remixes that have followed the original album's release.
It's in that vein that I share the Grey Album today with you today. I'm in no way benefiting financially from it. DJ Dangermouse doesn't make more money from it. Jay Z doesn't make or lose a dollar as a result. The Beatles don't lose money when these songs play. But every one of us that gets a listen benefits in an intangible way. The rightsholders of the Beatles music want these files to go away, but it's the most compelling hip hop album of the last few years and deserves to be shared with others, not silenced (at least for the next 24 hours).
Posted by 01:50 AM | TrackBack
February 20, 2004
Darn good music
I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but I really love every release of Steven's Acts of Volition Radio. Since he lives on Prince Edward Island, he's exposed to a whole lot of music I'm not and I consider him a tastemaker for Canadian indie rock.
It's a bummer to think that offering one big music file is probably completely illegal, and kind of loses some functionality in the whole deal. It'd be cool if there was a way, or an app (there probably is), that let you share playlists like this, including the between track banter, as downloadable mp3s.
I love Steven's whole series, and that the internet makes it possible for me to find this stuff. This is what radio used to be like, where DJs dug deep to find cool music you'd never find on your own, but that industry's gone completely bezerk with payola and record label deals and FCC regs on what you can play.
Posted by 03:38 AM | TrackBack
February 18, 2004
Whoa
Holy cow. I never thought I'd see the day when some friends would show up on Yahoo! News' Photos without the words "indicted", "charged with fraud" or "conspiracy" attached to their descriptions.
Posted by 05:38 AM | TrackBack
February 16, 2004
whew
Well, the server is back up and I've got a backlog of stuff I wanted to post about the last few days but I'm having trouble remembering it all.
The weirdest part was that I missed this site most of all. I kept kicking myself for not having a place to jot an idea down, or remind myself to look something up later.
Posted by 05:24 AM | TrackBack
February 08, 2004
An American embarrassment
Ibrahim Ferrer and members of the Buena Vista Social Club were denied entry into the US to attend the Grammy Awards.
Un-fucking-believable.
Posted by 10:57 AM
February 07, 2004
Betting on the future of music
I ran across Terra Naomi (who also has a blog) the other day and after hearing her music samples I was totally blown away. Listen to "Flesh for Bones" and wonder like I do as to why she's not a major label star right now. I assume it's only a matter of time really, she's got the sound and the looks down pat.
I predict she'll be a household name two years from now.
Posted by 04:34 AM | TrackBack
February 06, 2004
iChat as phone
Here's something I hadn't thought of: using a bluetooth headset with iChat. I already use iChat a great deal for communicating remotely with coworkers, but I usually wear big stereo headphones and use the iSight as the mic. Instead I could be wirelessly talking and listening using something like this.
I always knew iChat coupled with an iSight was a killer combo and I greatly prefer it over regular conference calls, but with a bluetooth headset it becomes even more useful for one-on-one conversations between other people with the same setup. Heck, if everyone you knew had a powerbook, iSight, and a bluetooth headset, this would kick ass all over Voice Over IP systems.
Posted by 09:33 AM | TrackBack
February 05, 2004
Electronic delivery ain't no record store
I bought a song and later an album off of the iTunes Music Store today and two problems came to mind:
1) I bought a single song while I was doing a zillion other things (other downloads, IM, ssh sessions on multiple servers, email checks) and there's a two second bad chunk in the middle of the song that's kind of like a CD skip but with more feedback. Maybe it was due to all the other network traffic, where do I exchange the downloaded song for a complete file? Can't iTunes check the download against a hash and redownload it if there's a mismatch?
2) I bought a "greatest hits" album from the same group and realized the single download I bought five minutes before is on it. How can I return my single song purchase? Could the iTMS given me a discount before I bought the same song twice?
Posted by 09:13 AM | TrackBack
February 03, 2004
Everything old is new again
I can't get enough of The Grey Album, a remix by DJ Danger Mouse of the entire Jay Z Black Album using nothing but Beatles White Album samples throughout.
Find it on your local usenet server, just like it was 1995 and you were in college downloading binaries again.
Posted by 08:10 AM | TrackBack
February 01, 2004
Does CBS think we're that stupid?
I'd like to someday live in a country where a quick nipple shown on TV isn't the end of civilization, and that's not what irks me about the halftime show tonight. What does get me about the Superbowl halftime show is CBS insisting it was an accident, calling it a "wardrobe malfunction."
It's funny, when you collect the evidence, I wonder if CBS really thinks the public is stupid enough to believe it:
1. It was planned from the start.
2. There are snaps on her outfit clearly visible, designed to be unsnapped. Most garments are sewn together sans snaps and don't fall apart.
3. She's wearing a "nipple shield" to partially cover her breast. If it was unplanned why on earth would she have this huge chunk of metal there? Was it to skirt some FCC rule against an entirely naked breast?
4. Worst of all: She has a single coming out which is coincidentally being rushed to the airwaves based on the "overwhelming worldwide demand." Check the timestamp on the bogus press release, it was posted before the game was even over.
Is it all a big coincidence or is this how controversy is manufactured to sell records these days?